Tuesday 19 January 2016

Lupin Ltd, Patent, Pitavastatin, WO2014203045



Lupin Ltd, Patent, Pitavastatin, WO2014203045
A NOVEL, GREEN AND COST EFFECTIVE PROCESS FOR SYNTHESIS OF TERT-BUTYL (3R,5S)-6-OXO-3,5-DIHYDROXY-3,5-O-ISOPROPYLIDENE-HEXANOATE
ROY, Bhairabnath; (IN).
SINGH, Girij, Pal; (IN).
LATHI, Piyush, Suresh; (IN).
AGRAWAL, Manoj, Kunjabihari; (IN).
MITRA, Rangan; (IN).
TRIVEDI, Anurag; (IN).
PISE, Vijay, Sadashiv; (IN).
RUPANWAR, Manoj; (IN)
The present invention describes an eco-friendly and cost effective process for the synthesis of teri-butyl (3R,5S)-6-oxo-3,5-dihydroxy-3,5-0-isopropylidene-hexanoate [I]
PITAVASTATIN
TEXT
tert-b tyl (3R,5S)-6-oxo-3,5-dihydroxy-3,5-0-isopropylidene-hexanoate [I] [CAS No. 124752-23-4] is key intermediate for the preparation of statins such as Atorvastatin (Tetrahedron 63, 2007, 8124 -8134), Cerivastatin (Journal of Labeled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals, 49, 2006 311-319), Fluvastatin [WO2007125547; US 4739073], Pitavastatin [WO2007/132482; US2012/22102 Al, WO2010/77062 A2; WO2012/63254 Al ; EP 304063; Tetrahedron Letters, 1993, 34, 513 – 516; Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 1995, 68, 364 – 372] and Rosuvastatin [WO2007/125547 A2; WO2011/132172 Al ; EP 521471]. Statins are used for treatment of hypercholesterolemia, which reduces the LDL cholesterol levels by inhibiting activity of HMG-CoA reductase enzyme, which is involved in the synthesis of cholesterol in liver.
[I]
Compound [I] is generally obtained by various methods of oxidation of teri-butyl 2- ((4R,65)-6-(hydroxymethyl)-2,2-dimethyl-l,3-dioxan-4-yl)acetate [compound II] and are discussed in details hereinafter. In addition, various methods for synthesis of compound [II] are also elaborated below.
[II]
[II]
A) tert-butyl2-((4«,6.S)-6-(hydroxymethyl)-2,2-dimethyl-l,3-dioxan-4-yl)acetate
[compound II]
US patent Number 5278313 describes a process for synthesis of compound [II]
(Schemel). In the said process, (5)-methyl 4-chloro-3-hydroxybutanoate has been obtained in only 70% yield through whole cell enzymatic reduction of methyl 4-chloro-3- oxobutanoate, which has a necessity of special equipment such as fermenters as well as other microbial facilities such as sterile area, autoclaves, incubator for growing seed culture, etc.
(S)-mefhyl 4-chloro-3-hydroxybutanoate upon reaction with teri-butyl acetate in presence of LiHMDS or LDA at -78°C, yielded (S)-ieri-butyl 6-chloro-5-hydroxy-3- oxohexanoate, which was further transformed to corresponding diol through syn selective reduction in presence of methoxydiethyl borane/sodium borohydride at -78°C. The diol thus obtained was converted to compound [II] .
The overall yield for this process is low and required special equipment such as fermenters, etc and in addition to that, this process is not cost effective due to use of costly reagent such as methoxydiethyl borane.
Moreover, methoxydiethylborane is highly pyrophoric (Encyclopedia for organic synthesis, editor in chief L. Paquette; 2, 5304; Published by John and Wiley Sons;
Organic Process Research & Development 2006, 10, 1292-1295) and hence safety is a major concern.
Scheme 1
EP 1282719 B l (PCT application WO 01/85975 Al ) discloses a process for synthesis of compound ( R, 5S)-tert-bv y\ 3,5,6-trihydroxyhexanoate from (S)-tert-b tyl-5,6-dihydroxy-3-oxohexanoate through a) asymmetric hydrogenation in presence of a chiral catalyst e.g. di-mu-chlorobis-[(p-cymene)chlororuthenium(II)] along with an auxiliary such as (IS, 2S)-(+)-N- (4-toluenesulfonyl)-l ,2-diphenylethylenediamine as ligand, which gave desired product only in 70% diastereomeric excess (de); b) Whole cell enzymatic reduction of (S)-tert- butyl 5,6-dihydroxy-3-oxohexanoate to obtain compound (3R, 5S)-tert-bv y\ 3,5,6-trihydroxyhexanoate in 99% de (80% yield).
It is needless to mention that it has necessity of fermenter and other microbiological equipment (Scheme 2).
Moreover, conversion of (2>R,5S)-tert-bv y\ 6-acetoxy-3,5-dihydroxyhexanoate to tert-bv yl 2-((4R,65)-6-(acetoxymethyl)-2,2-dimethyl-l ,3-dioxan-4-yl)acetate was accomplished in only 25% yield and also required the flash chromatography for isolation of desired product.
Thus, overall yield for this process is poor and process is not operation friendly especially at large scale hence cannot be considered feasible for commercial manufacturing.
Scheme 2
EP1317440 Bl (PCT Application WO 02/06266 Al) has disclosed the process for synthesis of compound [II] from 6-chloro-2,4,6-trideoxy-D-erythro-hexose (Scheme 3) .
In the said patent application 6-chloro-2,4,6-trideoxy-D-erythro-hexose was converted to (4R, 65)-4-hydroxy-6-chloromethyl-tetrahydropyran-2one with excess of bromine in presence of potassium bicarbonate, which liberates environmentally undesired gas i.e. carbon dioxide.
Moreover, starting material i.e. 6-chloro-2,4,6-trideoxy-D-erythro-hexose is not commercially available and conversion efficiency of starting material at large scale towards (4R, 65)-4-hydroxy-6-chloromethyl-tetrahydropyran-2-one is only 67%.
Scheme 3
US Patent No. 6689591 B2 has demonstrated the whole cell enzymatic reduction of teri-butyl 6-chloro-3,5-dioxohexanoate to compound [II] (Scheme 4).
In the said process, whole cell enzymatic reduction is not specific; yield for desired product is only 34% and other partially reduced products are also obtained.
Hence, further purification is required for obtaining the desired compound. Thus, this process is not suitable for commercial scale.
Scheme 4
Tatsuya et al (Tetrahedron Letters; 34, 1993,513 – 516) has reported synthesis of compound [I] from derivative of L-tartatric acid (Scheme 5).
In the said process, tartaric acid di-isopropyl ester is doubly protected by tert-butyldimethylsilyl group, which was reacted with dianion of teri-butyl acetoacetate to give β, δ-diketo ester compound.
β,δ-diketo ester was reacted with 2 equivalent of diisobutylaluminium hydride (which is a pyrophoric reagent) to afford -hydroxy,8-keto ester in only 60% yield.
This process is not industrially viable as overall yield is very low and also because of use of costly and pyrophoric reagents/chemicals.
Scheme 5
US7205418 (PCT application WO03/053950A1) has described the process for synthesis of compound [II] from (S)-ieri-butyl-3,4-epoxybutanoate (Scheme 6).
The overall yield for this process is very low and moreover, it required the diastereomeric separation of teri-butyl 2-(6-(iodomethyl)-2-oxo-l,3-dioxan-4-yl)acetate by flash chromatography.
Since overall requirement of title compound is very high, any operation involving flash chromatography will tend to render the process commercially unviable.
Scheme 6
Fengali et al (Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 17; 2006; 2907-2913) has reported the process for synthesis of compound [II] from racemic epichlorohydrin (Scheme 7).
In this process, racemic epichlorohydrin was converted to corresponding nitrile intermediate through reaction with sodium cyanide; nitrile intermediate thus obtained was further resolved through lipase catalyzed stereo-selective esterification to obtain (5)-4-(benzyloxy)-3-hydroxybutanenitrile and (R)-l-(benzyloxy)-3-cyanopropan-2-yl acetate;
separation of desired product i.e. (S)-4-(benzyloxy)-3-hydroxybutanenitrile having 98% de (40% yield) was done by column chromatography.
Needless to mention a commodity chemical like compound [I] cannot be manufactured by such a laboratory method, which involved number of steps.
Scheme 7
Bode et al (Organic letters, 2002, 4, 619-621) has reported diastereomer- specific hydrolysis of 1,3-diol-acetonides (Scheme 8).
In this publication, duration of the reaction for diastereomer- specific hydrolysis of 1,3, diol-acetonides is reported to be 4 h, however, in our hand it was observed that hardly any reaction took place in 4 h, which made it non-reproducible.
In addition to that, separation of desired product is achieved by flash chromatography and it is needless to mention that any process which involved flash chromatography would render the process to be commercially unviable.
Hence, additional innovation needs to be put in for making the process industrially viable.
Scheme 8
CN 101613341A has reported the process for synthesis of compound [II] (Scheme
9).
In the same patent application tert-b tyl (S)-6-chloro-5-hydroxy-3-oxohexanoate was synthesized through Blaise condensation of (5)-4-chloro-3-hydorxy-butanenitrile with zinc enolate of tert butyl bromo acetate.
In the literature, synthesis of tert-bv yl (S)-6-chloro-5-hydroxy-3-oxohexanoate was reported through Blaise condensation of silyl protected (5)-4-chloro-3-(trimethylsilyl)oxy-butanenitrile with zinc enolate of tert butyl bromo acetate, in good yield (Synthesis 2004, 16, 2629-2632). Thus, protection of hydroxy group in (5)-4-chloro-3-hydorxy-butanenitrile is imperative.
In the said Chinese patent application, in claim 7, it was mentioned that solvent used for conversion of tert-bv yl (5)-6-chloro-5-hydroxy-3-oxohexanoate to ( R,5S)-tert-butyl 6-chloro-3,5-dihydroxyhexanoate is anyone or mixture of more than one from tetrahydrofuran, ether, methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, /so-propanol and ethylene glycol.
However, in enablement the only example using mixture of solvent was that of THF-methanol (Experimental section, Example 4: The preparation of (R,5)-6-chloro-3,5- dihydroxyhexanoate) and same outcome was expected in other individual or mixture of solvents.
Claim 8 of CN 101613341A mentioned that reduction was carried out by any one or mixture of more than one reducing agents such as sodium borohydride, potassium borohydride, lithium aluminum hydride, diethylmethoxy borane, triethyl borane and tributyl borane.
It implies that either any one of the reducing agents or a mixture of the same can be employed. From reaction mechanism it is very much clear that diethylmethoxy borane, triethyl borane and tributyl borane form the six membered complex between optically active hydroxyl and carbonyl group, which gets reduced by sodium borohydride, signifying that individually diethylmethoxy borane, triethyl borane and tributyl borane are not reducing agents
Moreover, in claims 12 and 13 (Experimental section, Example 4: The preparation of (R,S)-6-chloro-3,5-dihydroxyhexanoate), it is mentioned that reduction should be carried out in temperature range -80 °C to -60 °C, implying that reaction would not work beyond this temperature range i.e. it would work in the temperature window of -80 °C to -60 °C only.
Summarizing, the teachings of the application are not workable.
Scheme 9
Wolberg et al (Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2000, 4306) has reported that diastereomeric excess for syn selective reduction using mixture of diethyl methoxy borane/sodium borohydride of compound [VI] gave 93% de for compound [VIII], which required further re-crystallization to obtain compound [VIII] in 99% de and 70% yield.
Thus, all the reported methods for stereo-selective hydride reduction of compound [VI] were achieved through mixture of trialkyl borane or diethyl methoxy borane & sodium borohydride in THF, at -78°C. As mentioned earlier, trialkyl borane or diethyl methoxy borane are pyrophoric in nature; in addition to that anhydrous THF is costly and moreover, reaction required large dilution.
Hence, there is need for developing efficient, environment friendly, cost effective and green process for stereo-selective reduction compound [VI].
B) The process of Oxidation of compound [II] to compound [I] has been discussed in following literature processes.
1) Swern oxidation (US4970313; Tetrahedron Letters, 1990, 2545
Synthetic Communications, 2003, 2275 – 2284).
2) Parrkh-Doering oxidation (J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1967, 89, 5505-5507)
3) TEMPO/NaOCl oxidization (EP2351762)
4) Trichloroisocyanuric acid/ TEMPO (CN 101747313A)
5) Oxidation of compound [II] to compound [I] through IBX [CN101475558A].
It would be evident that most of the reported methods are not “green” and
environmentally benign; none of the reported methods use molecular oxygen as oxidizing agent in presence of metal catalyst/co-catalyst.
Example 18: Process for synthesis of tert-butyl 2-((4R,6S)-6-formyl-2,2-dimethyl-l,3-dioxan-4-yl)acetate [I]
A reactor was charged with 1.1 g of copper (I) chloride and 10 mL of acetonitrile. 2-2′ Bipyridyl (156 mg) and TEMPO (156 mg) were added to the reactor under oxygen environment at 25°C. A solution of (6-Hydroxymethyl-2,2-dimethyl-[l,3]dioxan-4-yl)-acetic acid tert-butyl ester 2.6 g in 26 mL DCM was added dropwise over a period of 10 min into it. The reaction mass was stirred at 40°C and progress of reaction was monitored on GLC, which shows that 90% conversion for desired product.
Example 19: Process for synthesis of tert-butyl 2-((4R,6S)-6-formyl-2,2-dimethyl-l,3-dioxan-4-yl)acetate [I]
A reactor was charged with 1.1 g of copper (I) chloride and 10 mL of dichlorome thane. 2-2′ Bipyridyl (156 mg) and TEMPO (156 mg) were added to the reactor under oxygen environment at 25°C. A solution of (6-Hydroxymethyl-2,2-dimethyl-[l,3]dioxan-4-yl)-acetic acid tert-butyl ester 2.6 g in 26 mL DCM was added dropwise over a period of 10 min into it. The reaction mass was stirred at 40°C and progress of reaction was monitored on GLC, which shows that 90% conversion for desired product.



AUTHORS


///////

Lupin Ltd, New patent, Pitavastatin, WO 2016005919



Formula (1)
Lupin Ltd, New patent, Pitavastatin, WO 2016005919
MANE, Narendra, Dattatray; (IN).
NEHATE, Sagar, Purushottam; (IN).
GODBOLE, Himanshu, Madhav; (IN).
SINGH, Girij, Pal; (IN)
The present invention is directed to polymorphic forms of Pitavastatin sodium and processes for preparation of the same
Novel crystalline polymorphic forms (I and II) and an amorphous form of pitavastatin, useful for treating hyperlipidemia and mixed dyslipidemia.
Also claims a method for preparing the crystalline and amorphous forms of pitavastatin. In January 2016, Newport Premium™ reported that Lupin holds an active US DMF for pitavastatin calcium since July 2013.
Nissan Chemical Industries and licensee Kowa, with sub-licensees Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Esteve, JW Pharmaceutical, Recordati, Laboratorios Delta and Zydus-Cadila, have developed and launched pitavastatin.
WO2014203045, claiming a process for preparing an intermediate useful in the synthesis of statins (eg pitavastatin).
Pitavastatin is a cholesterol lowering agent of the class of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. The HMG-CoA reductase enzyme catalyzes the conversions of HMG- CoA to mevalonate. Inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase are commonly referred to as “statins.” Statins are therapeutically effective drugs used for reducing low density lipoprotein (LDL) particle concentration in the blood stream of patients at risk for cardiovascular disease.
Pitavastatin is one of the synthetic statins which is chemically known as (3R, 5S, 6E)-7-[2-cyclopropyl-4-(4-fluorophenyl) quinoline-3-yl]-3, 5-dihydroxy-6- heptenoic acid represented by structural formula (1):
Formula (1)
Pitavastatin and its pharmaceutically acceptable salts are described in US 5,753,675 patent and US 5,856,336 patent, respectively.
Processes for the preparation of Pitavastatin are well documented in the literature. European patents, EP 0304063 and EP 1099694 and reports by Miyachi et al (Tetrahedron Letters
(1993) vol. 34, pages 8267-8270) and Takahashi et al (Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan (1995) Vol. 68, 2649-2656) describe processes for preparation of Pitavastatin.
US 5,872,130 patent discloses sodium salt of Pitavastatin. This patent, however, is silent about the solid state form of Pitavastatin Sodium.
It is generally known in the art that active pharmaceutical ingredients frequently do not exhibit the range of physical properties that makes them directly suitable for development. One of the approaches that is used to modify the characteristics of drug substances is to employ a salt form of the substance, since salts enable one to modify aqueous solubility, dissolution rate, solution pH, crystal form, hygroscopicity, chemical stability, melting point and even mechanical properties. The beneficial aspects of using salt forms of active pharmaceutical ingredients are well known and represent one of the means to increase the degree of solubility of otherwise intractable substances and to increase bioavailability.
Although the known salts of Pitavastatin like sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium etc. and their polymorphic forms may address some of the deficiencies in terms of formulated product and its manufacturability. There remains a need for yet further improvement in these properties as well as improvements in other properties such as flowability, and solubility.
Polymorphism is a known phenomenon among pharmaceutical substances. It is commonly defined as the ability of any substance to exist in two or more crystalline phases that have a different arrangement and/or conformation of the molecules in the crystal lattice. Different polymorphic forms of the same pharmaceutically active moiety also differ in their physical properties such as melting point, solubility, chemical reactivity, etc. These properties may also appreciably influence pharmaceutical properties such as dissolution rate and bioavailability.
Further, the discovery of new polymorphic forms and solvates of an active pharmaceutical ingredient provides broader scope to a formulation scientist for formulation optimization, for example by providing a product with different properties, e.g., better processing or handling characteristics, improved dissolution profile, or improved shelf-life. For at least these reasons, there is a need for polymorphs of Pitavastatin salts such as Pitavastatin sodium.
New polymorphic forms and hydrates and/or solvates of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of Pitavastatin can also provide an opportunity to improve the performance characteristics of a pharmaceutical product.
Therefore, there is a scope to prepare novel polymorphic forms of Pitavastatin sodium and hydrates and/or solvates.
Example-1: Preparation of Pitavastatin Sodium (Form-I)
A mixture of 40.0 gm Pitavastatin acid and 120 ml water was cooled to 15-20 °C temperature. Thereafter aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide (4.0 gm) in water (20 ml) was added to the reaction mixture. The reaction mixture was stirred for 30-45 min at 15-20 °C temperature. Ethyl acetate (80ml) was added into the reaction mixture at 15-20 °C temperature, stirred for 15-20 min and the layers were separated. The aqueous layer was filtered and acetonitrile (1200 ml) was gradually added to the aqueous layer under stirring till the precipitation was completed. The reaction mixture was cooled to 5-8 °C temperature and stirred for 2-3 hours at 5-8 °C temperature. The precipitated solid was filtered, washed with acetonitrile (40ml) and dried at 45-50 °C temperature under vacuum for 10-12 hours to afford the title compound (28.0 gm).
Yield (w/w): 0.70 (66.0%)
HPLC purity: 99.70 %
Example-2: Preparation of Pitavastatin Sodium (Form-II)
A mixture of 40.0 gm of Pitavastatin acid and 120 ml of water was cooled to 15-20°C temperature under stirring. Thereafter aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide (4.0 gm) in water (20 ml) was added to the reaction mixture. The reaction mixture was stirred for 30-45 min at 15-20 °C temperature. Ethyl acetate (80ml) was added to the reaction mixture at 15-20 °C temperature, stirred for 15-20 min and the layers were separated. The aqueous layer was filtered and acetonitrile (1200 ml) was gradually added to the aqueous layer under stirring till the precipitation was completed. The reaction mixture was cooled to 5-8 °C temperature and stirred for 2-3 hours at 5-8 °C temperature. The precipitated solid was filtered, washed with acetonitrile (40ml) and dried at 45-50 °C temperature under vacuum for 10-12 hours and kept in a petri dish at 25-30 °C and 60 ± 5 RH (relative humidity) for 18-24 hours to afford the title compound (31.6 gm).
Yield (w/w): 0.79 (65.8%)
HPLC purity: 99.70 %
Example-3: Preparation of Pitavastatin Sodium Amorphous
Pitavastatin sodium (3.0 gm) and ethanol (60 ml) were taken in a round bottomed flask at 25-30 °C temperature. The reaction mixture was filtered and the solvent was distilled off on rotatory evaporator under vacuum maintaining bath temperature at 45-50 °C temperature. Thereafter the reaction mixture was degassed under vacuum for 2-3 hours to afford the title compound (2.8gm).
HPLC purity: 99.70 %.
/////////Lupin Ltd, New patent, Pitavastatin, WO 2016005919, statins, POLYMORPH

Dr Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd, New patent, WO 2016005960, Liraglutide

 

!e™A!a™Trp™leu™Va!~-Arg~~GIy-~Arg~~Gly~~OH
Formula (I)
LIRAGLUTIDE

Dr Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd, New patent, WO 2016005960,  Liraglutide
Process for preparation of liraglutide
Kola, Lavanya; Ramasamy, Karthik; Thakur, Rajiv Vishnukant; Katkam, Srinivas; Komaravolu, Yagna Kiran Kumar; Nandivada, Giri Babu; Gandavadi, Sunil Kumar; Nariyam Munaswamy, Sekhar; Movva, Kishore Kumar
Improved process for preparing liraglutide, by solid phase synthesis, useful for treating type 2 diabetes.
It having been developed and launched by Novo Nordisk, under license from Scios and Massachusetts General Hospital.
Liraglutide, marketed under the brand name Victoza, is a long-acting glucagon like peptide agonist developed by Novo Nordisk for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
Liraglutide is an injectable drug that reduces the level of sugar (glucose) in the blood. It is used for treating type 2 diabetes and is similar to exenatide (Byetta). Liraglutide belongs to a class of drugs called incretin mimetics because these drugs mimic the effects of incretins. Incretins, such as human-glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1 ), are hormones that are produced and released into the blood by the intestine in response to food. GLP-1 increases the secretion of insulin from the pancreas, slows absorption of glucose from the gut, and reduces the action of glucagon. (Glucagon is a hormone that increases glucose production by the liver.)
All three of these actions reduce levels of glucose in the blood. In addition, GLP-1 reduces appetite. Liraglutide is a synthetic (man-made) hormone that resembles and acts like GLP-1 . In studies, Liraglutide treated patients achieved lower blood glucose levels and experienced weight loss.
Liraglutide, an analog of human GLP-1 acts as a GLP-1 receptor agonist. The peptide precursor of Liraglutide, produced by a process that includes expression of recombinant DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has been engineered to be 97% homologous to native human GLP-1 by substituting arginine for lysine at position 34. Liraglutide is made by attaching a C-16 fatty acid (palmitic acid) with a glutamic acid spacer on the remaining lysine residue at position 26 of the peptide precursor.
The molecular formula of Liraglutide is Ci72H265N4305i and the molecular weight is 3751 .2 Daltons. It is represented by the structure of formula (I)
!e™A!a™Trp™leu™Va!~-Arg~~GIy-~Arg~~Gly~~OH
Formula (I)
U.S. Patent No. 7572884 discloses a process for preparing Liraglutide by recombinant technology followed by acylation and removal of N-terminal extension.
U.S. Patent No. 7273921 and 6451974 discloses a process for acylation of Arg-34GLP-1 (7-37) to obtain Liraglutide.
U.S. Patent No. 8445433 discloses a solid phase synthesis of Liraglutide using a fragment approach.
International Application publication No. WO2013037266A1 discloses solid phase synthesis of Liraglutide, characterized in that comprises A) the presence of the activator system, solid phase carrier and by resin Fmoc protection N end obtained by coupling of glycine (Fmoc-Gly-OH) Fmoc-Gly-resin; B) by solid phase synthesis, prepared in accordance with the sequentially advantage Liraglutide principal chain N end of the coupling with Fmoc protected amino acid side chain protection and, wherein the lysine using Fmoc-Lys (Alloc)-OH; C) Alloc getting rid of the lysine side chain protecting group; D) by solid phase synthesis, the lysine side chain coupling Palmitoyl-Glu-OtBu; E) cracking, get rid of protecting group and resin to obtain crude Liraglutide ; F) purification, freeze-dried, to obtain Liraglutide.
Even though, the above mentioned prior art discloses diverse processes for the preparation of Liraglutide, they are often not amenable on commercial scale because of expensive amino acid derivatives such as pseudo prolines used in those processes.
Hence, there remains a need to provide simple, cost effective, scalable and robust processes for the preparation of Liraglutide involving commercially viable amino acid derivatives and reagents.
EXAMPLE 1 :
Stage I Preparation of Wang resin-Gly-Arg(pbf)-Gly-Arg(pbf)-Val-Leu-Trp(Boc)-Ala-lleu-Phe-Glu(Otbu)-Lys-{Glu(OH)-NH(palmitoyl)}-Ala-Ala-Gln(trt)-Gly-OH-Glu(Otbu)-Leu-Tyr(Otbu)-Ser(Otbu)-Ser(Otbu)-Val-Asp(Otbu)-Ser(Otbu)-Thr(Otbu)-Phe-Thr(Otbu)-Gly-Glu(Otbu)-Ala-Boc-His(trt)-OH.
Wang resin (50gm) is swelled in DCM (500ml) for 1 hr in a sintered flask. DCM was filtered using Vacuum. Fmoc-Glycine (44.6 gm, 150 mmol) was dissolved in dichloromethane (250 ml). 1 -(2-mesitylene sulfonyl)-3-nitro-1 H-1 ,2,4 triazole (44.4 gm, 150 mmol) and 1 -methyl imidazole (9 ml, 1 12 mmol) was then added. The reaction mixture was added to wang resin and stirred for 3hrs at about 25° C. The resin was washed with DCM and a second lot of Fmoc-Glycine (27 gm, 90 mmol) was dissolved in dichloromethane (250 ml). 1 -(2-mesitylene sulfonyl)-3-nitro-1 H-1 ,2,4 triazole (26.6 gm, 90 mmol) and 1 -methyl imidazole (5.3 ml, 90 mmol) was then added and stirred for 3hrs. The resin was washed with DCM and a sample of resin beads were checked for UV analysis. The capping was carried out using acetic anhydride (15 ml) DCM (120 ml) and pyridine (120 ml). The resin was washed with dichloromethane and DMF. The Fmoc protecting group was removed by treatment with 20% piperidine in DMF. The
resin was washed repeatedly with DMF. The next amino acid Fmoc-Arg(pbf)-OH (52 gm, 80 mmol) dissolved in 250 ml DMF was then added. The coupling was carried out by addition of HOBt (10.8gm, 80 mmol) and DIC (6.2ml, 80 mmol) in DMF. The completion of the coupling was confirmed by a ninhydrin test. After washing the resin, the Fmoc protecting group was removed with 20% piperidine in DMF. These steps were repeated each time with the respective amino acid according to the peptide sequence. After coupling 12th amino acid Fmoc-Lys (Alloc)-OH, deprotection of alloc group is carried out with palladium tetrakis and phenyl silane in DCM. The resin was washed repeatedly with DMF. The next amino acid H-Glu(OH)-NH(palmitoyl)-Otbu (9.9 gm, 0.023 moles) dissolved in 250 ml DMF was then added. The coupling was carried out by addition of HOBt (10.8gm, 80 mmol) and DIC (6.2ml, 80 mmol) in DMF. The completion of the coupling was confirmed by a ninhydrin test. After washing the resin, the Fmoc protecting group of Lys was removed with 20% piperidine in DMF. The next amino acid Fmoc-Ala-OH (52 gm, 80 mmol) dissolved in 250 ml DMF was then added. The coupling was carried out by addition of HOBt (10.8gm, 80 mmol) and DIC (6.2ml, 80 mmol) in DMF. The completion of the coupling was confirmed by a ninhydrin test. After washing the resin, the Fmoc protecting group was removed with 20% piperidine in DMF. These steps were repeated each time with the respective amino acid according to the peptide sequence. The resin was washed repeatedly with DMF, Methanol and MTBE and dried under vacuum.
Stage II: Cleavage of Liraglutide from resin along with global deprotection
45gms of resin obtained in stage I was treated with cleavage cocktail mixture of TFA (462.5ml), TIPS (12.5ml), Water (12.5ml), and Phenol (12.5 ml), stirred at 0°C for 30 min. and at 25°C for 3hrs at 200RPM. Then the reaction mixture was filtered, repeatedly wash the resin with TFA and the filtrate was concentrated on Rotary evaporator at 30°C. Pour the concentrated solution to MTBE (2L) at 4°C slowly and stir for 1 hr. The precipitate obtained is filtered and dried in a vacuum tray drier to afford 18 gm of Liraglutide crude with a purity of 27.5%.
Stage III: Purification of crude Liraglutide using RP HPLC.
The crude Liraglutide (4 gm) of purity around 27.5% is dissolved in 10 mM Tris buffer (120ml) of pH: 8.00 and 0.5 N NaOH is further added drop wise to the solution for making the crude solid completely dissolved. The solution is further passed through 0.2 micron filter. The Reverse phase C 18 – 150 Angstrom media (C18 silica media – 10 micron particle size) is equilibrated with 10mM Tris buffer of pH: 8.0 The crude solution is loaded onto the column and the gradient elution is performed as per the below tabular column against the mobile phase B (Acetonitrile).
Table 1 : Gradient program for pre purification
The desired fractions are collected in the gradient range of and the fractions (F1 , F2, F3, F4 and F5) whose purity > 80% are pooled. The pooled fractions are then subjected to further purification.
The Pooled fractions having purity >80% are then subjected to C18 RPHPLC silica media (5 micron particle size) for further purification. The pooled fractions – Feed is diluted with purified water in the ratio of 1 :2 (one part of pooled fraction to two parts of purified water) as a part of sample preparation before loading into the column. The media C18 is first equilibrated with 0.1 % TFA for 3 column volumes (1 CV = bed volume of media). After equilibration, the sample is loaded onto the column and the gradient
elution is performed as per the below tabular column against the mobile phase B (Acetonitrile).
Table 2: Gradient program for second purification
The desired fractions are collected in the gradient range of and the fraction whose purity > 96% are pooled together and lyophilized to afford 220mg of Liraglutide trifluoro acetate salt. The pooled fractions and their purity by HPLC are listed in the below table.
The pooled fractions with the purity of average 97% are subjected further to de solvation to remove the Acetonitrile content by Rota vapor. The final solution was filtered through 0.2 micron filter and lyophilized to get Liraglutide API.
EXAMPLE 2:
Stage I Preparation of Tentagel SPHB resin-Gly-Arg(pbf)-Gly-Arg(pbf)-Val-Leu-Trp(Boc)-Ala-lleu-Phe-Glu(Otbu)-Lys-{Glu(OH)-NH(palmitoyl)}-Ala-Ala-Gln(trt)-Gly-OH-Glu(Otbu)-Leu-Tyr(Otbu)-Ser(Otbu)-Ser(Otbu)-Val-Asp(Otbu)-Ser(Otbu)-Thr(Otbu)-Phe-Thr(Otbu)-Gly-Glu(Otbu)-Ala-Boc-His(trt)-OH using Fragment approach.
Fragments used are as follows
1 . Fmoc-Arg(pbf)-Gly-OH.
2. Fmoc-Leu-Ala-Arg(pbf)-OH.
3. Fmoc-lle-Ala-Trp(boc)-OH.
4. Fmoc-Glu(Otbu)-Phe-OH.
5. Fmoc-Glu(Otbu)-Phe-OH.
6. Fmoc-Lys-Glu-Palmitic acid.
7. Fmoc-Gly-Gln(trt)-Ala-Ala-OH.
8. Fmoc-Tyr(Otbu)-Leu-Glu(Otbu)-OH.
9. Fmoc-Val-Ser(Otbu)-Ser(Otbu)-OH.
10. Fmoc-Phe-Thr(Otbu)-Ser(Otbu)-Asp(Otbu)-OH
1 1 . Fmoc-Gly-Thr(Otbu)-OH.
12. Boc-His(Trt)-Ala-Glu(Otbu)-OH.
Tentagel SPHB resin (30gm) is swelled in DCM (300ml) for 1 hr in a sintered flask. DCM was filtered using Vacuum. Fmoc-Glycine (13.8 gm, 46.8 moles) was dissolved in dichloromethane (150 ml). 1 -(2-mesitylene sulfonyl)-3-nitro-1 H-1 ,2,4 triazole (13.8 gm, 46.8 moles) and 1 -methyl imidazole (2.4 ml, 29.25 moles) was then added. The resulting solution was added to tentagel resin and stirred for 2hrs at about 25° C. The resin was washed with DCM and a second lot of Fmoc-Glycine (13.8 gm, 46.8 moles) was dissolved in dichloromethane (150 ml). 1 -(2-mesitylene sulfonyl)-3-nitro-I H-1 ,2,4 triazole (13.8 gm, 46.8 moles) and 1 -methyl imidazole (2.4 ml, 29.25 moles) was then added and stirred for 2hrs. The resin was washed with DCM and a sample of resin beads were checked for UV analysis. The Fmoc protecting group was removed by treatment with 20% piperidine in DMF. The resin was washed repeatedly
with DMF. The next amino acid fragment 1 Fmoc-Gly-Arg(pbf)-OH (8.25 gm, 1 1 .7 moles) dissolved in 150 ml DMF was then added. The coupling was carried out by addition of HOBt (2.1 gm, 1 1 .7 moles) and DIC (2.5ml, 1 1 .7 moles) in DMF for 2hrs. The completion of the coupling was confirmed by a ninhydrin test. After washing the resin, the Fmoc protecting group was removed with 20% piperidine in DMF. These steps were repeated each time with the respective amino acid fragments according to the peptide sequence. The resin was washed repeatedly with DMF, Methanol and MTBE and dried under vacuum.
Stage II: Cleavage of Liraglutide from resin along with global deprotection
58gms of resin obtained from stage I was treated with cleavage cocktail mixture of TFA (555ml), TIPS (15ml), Water (15ml), and Phenol (15 ml) and stirred at 0°C for 30 min. at 25°C for 3hrs at 200RPM. Then filter the reaction mixture, repeatedly wash the resin with TFA and concentrate on Rotary evaporator at 30°C. Pour the concentrated solution to MTBE at 4°C slowly and stirred for 1 hr. The precipitate obtained was filtered and dried in a vacuum tray drier to afford 23.12 gm of crude Liraglutide with a purity of 36.89%.
Stage III: Purification of crude Liraglutide using RP HPLC.
The crude Liraglutide (4 gm) of purity around 27.5% is dissolved in 10 mM Tris buffer (120ml) of pH: 8.00 and 0.5 N NaOH is further added drop wise to the solution for making the crude solid completely dissolved. The solution is further passed through 0.2 micron filter. The Reverse phase C 18 – 150 Angstrom media (Irregular C18 silica media – 10 micron particle size) is equilibrated with 10mM Tris buffer of pH: 8.0 The crude solution is loaded onto the column and the gradient elution is performed as per the below tabular column against the mobile phase B (Acetonitrile).
Table 1 : Gradient program for pre purification
60 40 30
55 45 30
52 48 30
51 49 60
The desired fractions are collected in the gradient range of and the fractions (F1 , F2, F3, F4 and F5) whose purity > 80% are pooled. The pooled fractions then subjected to further purification.
The Pooled fractions having purity >80% are then subjected to C18 RPHPLC silica media (5 micron particle size) for further purification. The pooled fractions – Feed is diluted with purified water in the ratio of 1 :2 (one part of pooled fraction to two parts of purified water) as a part of sample preparation before loading into the column. The media C18 is first equilibrated with 0.1 % TFA for 3 column volumes (1 CV = bed volume of media). After equilibration, the sample is loaded onto the column and the gradient elution is performed as per the below tabular column against the mobile phase B (Acetonitrile).
Table 2: Gradient program for second purification
The desired fractions are collected in the gradient range and the fraction whose purity > 96% are pooled together and Lyophilized to afford 865 mg of Liraglutide trifluoro acetate salt. The pooled fractions and their purity by HPLC are listed in the below table.
The pooled fractions with the purity of average 97% are subjected further to de solvation to remove the Acetonitrile content by Rota vapor. The final solution was filtered through 0.2 micron filter and lyophilized to get Liraglutide API.
G.V. Prasad, chairman, Dr Reddy’s Laboratories.
REFERENCE
IN2014CH3453 INDIAN PATENT
WO 2016005960, CLICK FOR PATENT
//////

Monday 11 January 2016

New patent, WO 2016001885, Dr Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd, Eliglustat hemitartarate

DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES LIMITED [IN/IN]; 8-2-337, Road No. 3, Banjara Hills, Telangana, India Hyderabad 500034 (IN)
VELAGA, Dharma Jagannadha Rao; (IN).
PEDDY, Vishweshwar; (IN).
VYALA, Sunitha; (IN)
(WO2016001885) AMORPHOUS FORM OF ELIGLUSTAT HEMITARTARATE
Chemically Eliglustat is named N-[(1 R,2R)-2-(2,3-dihydro-1 ,4-benzodioxin-6-yl)-2-hydroxy-1 -(1 -pyrrolidinylmethyl)ethyl]-Octanamide(2R!3R)-2,3-dihydroxybutanedioate and the hemitartarate salt of eliglustat has the structural formula as shown in Formula I.
Formula I
Eliglustat hemitartrate (Genz-1 12638), currently under development by Genzyme, is a glucocerebroside (glucosylceramide) synthase inhibitor for the treatment of Gaucher disease and other lysosomal storage disorders. Eliglustat hemitartrate is orally active with potent effects on the primary identified molecular target for type 1 Gaucher disease and other glycosphingolipidoses, appears likely to fulfill high expectations for clinical efficacy. Gaucher disease belongs to the class of lysosomal diseases known as glycosphingolipidoses, which result directly or indirectly from the accumulation of glycosphingolipids, many hundreds of which are derived from glucocerebroside. The first step in glycosphingolipid biosynthesis is the formation of glucocerebroside, the primary storage molecule in Gaucher disease, via glucocerebroside synthase (uridine diphosphate [UDP] – glucosylceramide glucosyl transferase). Eliglustat hemitartrate is based on improved inhibitors of glucocerebroside synthase, and is currently under development by Genzyme.
U.S. patent No. 7,196,205 discloses a process for the preparation of Eliglustat or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
U.S. patent No. 6855830, 7265228, 7615573, 7763738, 8138353, U.S. patent application publication No. 2012/296088 discloses process for preparation of Eliglustat and intermediates thereof.
U.S. patent application publication No. 2013/137743 discloses (i) a hemitartrate salt of Eliglustat, (ii) a hemitartrate salt of Eliglustat, wherein at least 70% by weight of the salt is crystalline, (iii) a hemitartrate salt of Eliglustat, wherein at least 99% by weight of the salt is in a single crystalline form.
It has been disclosed earlier that the amorphous forms in a number of drugs exhibit different dissolution characteristics and in some cases different bioavailablity patterns compared to crystalline forms [Konne T., Chem pharm Bull., 38, 2003(1990)]. For some therapeutic indications one bioavailabihty pattern may be favoured over another. An amorphous form of Cefuroxime axetil is a good example for exhibiting higher bioavailability than the crystalline form.
Solid amorphous dispersions of drugs are known generally to improve the stability and solubility of drug products. However, such dispersions are generally unstable over time. Amorphous dispersions of drugs tend to convert to crystalline forms over time, which can lead to improper dosing due to differences of the solubility of crystalline drug material compared to amorphous drug material. The present invention, however, provides stable amorphous dispersions of eliglustat hemitartrate. Moreover, the present invention provides solid dispersions of eliglustat hemitartrate which may be reproduced easily and is amenable for processing into a dosage form.
There remains a need to provide solid state forms of eliglustat hemitartarate which are advantageous in a cost effective and environment friendly manner.
EXAMPLES
Example 1 : Preparation of amorphous form of eliglustat hemitartarate.
500mg of eliglustat hemitartarate was dissolved in 14 mL of dichloromethane at 26°C and stirred for 15 min. The solution is filtered to remove the undissolved particles and the filtrate is distilled under reduced pressure at 45°C. After distillation the solid was dried under vacuum at 45°C.
Example 2: Preparation of amorphous form of eliglustat hemitartarate.
500mg of eliglustat hemitartarate was dissolved in 70 mL of ethanol and stirred for 15 min at 25° – 30°C. The solution is filtered to remove the undissolved particles and the filtrate is distilled under reduced pressure at 48°C. After distillation the solid was dried under vacuum at 48°C.
Example 3: Preparation of amorphous form of eliglustat hemitartarate.
500mg of eliglustat hemitartarate was dissolved in 20 mL of methanol and stirred for 15 min at 25° – 30°C. The solution is filtered to remove the undissolved particles and the filtrate is distilled under reduced pressure at 48°C. After distillation the solid was dried under vacuum at 48°C.
Example 4: Preparation of a solid dispersion comprising an amorphous form of eliglustat hemitartarate and PVP-K30.
500mg of eliglustat hemitartarate and 500mg of PVP-K30 was dissolved in 20 mL of methanol and stirred for 10 min at 25° – 30°C. The solution is filtered to remove the undissolved particles and the filtrate is distilled under reduced pressure at 48°C. After distillation the solid is dried under vacuum at 48°C.
Example 5: Preparation of a solid dispersion comprising an amorphous form of eliglustat hemitartarate and hydroxy propyl cellulose.
500mg of eliglustat hemitartarate and 500 mg of hydroxy propyl cellulose was dissolved in 30 ml of methanol and stirred for 10 min at 25° – 30°C. The solution is distilled under reduced pressure at 49°C. After distillation the solid is dried under vacuum at 49°C.
Example 6: Preparation of a solid dispersion comprising an amorphous form of eliglustat hemitartarate and hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose.
500mg of eliglustat hemitartarate and 500 mg of hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose was dissolved in 30 mL of methanol and stirred for 10 min at 25° – 30°C. The solution is distilled under reduced pressure at 48°C. After distillation the solid is dried under vacuum at 48°C.
Example 7 Preparation of amorphous form of eliglustat hemitartarate.
3g of eliglustat hemitartarate was dissolved in 75 mL of methanol and stirred at 25°C for dissolution. The solution was filtered to remove the undissolved particles and the filtrate is subjected for spray drying at inlet temperature of 70°C and outlet temperature of 42°C to afford the title compound.
Example 8: Preparation of amorphous form of eliglustat hemitartarate.
500mg of eliglustat hemitartarate was dissolved in 30 mL of isopropanol and stirred at 56°C for dissolution. The solution was filtered to remove the undissolved particles and the filtrate is subjected to complete distillation under reduced pressure and drying at about 56°C to afford the title compound.
Example 9: Preparation of amorphous form of eliglustat hemitartarate.
1 g of eliglustat hemitartarate was provided in 40 mL of ethyl acetate and stirred at about 63°C. Then methanol (5 mL) is added at the same temperature to obtain clear solution which was filtered to remove the undissolved particles. Then additional quantity of methanol (5mL) is added to the filtrate and the filtrate was again filtered to remove particles. The obtained filtrate was subjected to complete distillation under reduced pressure and drying at about 57°C to afford the title compound.
Example 10: Preparation of amorphous form of eliglustat hemitartarate.
1 g of eliglustat hemitartarate was provided in 40 mL of acetone and stirred at about 55°C followed by addition of methanol (15 mL). The mixture is stirred at 55°C for clear solution and filtered to remove the undissolved particles. The obtained filtrate was subjected to complete distillation under reduced pressure and drying at about 57°C to afford the title compound.
Example 11 : Preparation of amorphous form of eliglustat hemitartarate.
1 g of eliglustat hemitartarate was provided in 25 mL of isopropyl alcohol and 25 mL of ethanol. The mixture was stirred at about 58°C for dissolution and filtered to remove the undissolved particles. The obtained filtrate was subjected to complete distillation under reduced pressure and drying at about 57°C to afford the title compound.
Example 12 Preparation of amorphous form of eliglustat hemitartarate.
5g of eliglustat hemitartarate was provided in 300 mL of isopropyl alcohol and stirred at about 59°C for dissolution. The solution was filtered to remove the undissolved particles and the filtrate is subjected for spray drying at inlet temperature of 65°C and outlet temperature of 37°C to afford the title compound according to Fig. 6
Example 13: Preparation of a solid dispersion comprising an amorphous form of eliglustat hemitartarate and Copovidone
500mg of eliglustat hemitartarate and 500mg of Copovidone were dissolved in 30 mL of methanol and stirred for clear solution, then filtered to make it particle free. The solvent from the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure at 45°C and obtained solid was subjected to drying at 45°C to afford the title solid. The resulting dispersion was found to be amorphous by X-ray powder diffraction.
Example 14: Preparation of a solid dispersion comprising an amorphous form of eliglustat hemitartarate and Copovidone
2g of eliglustat hemitartarate and 2g of Copovidone were dissolved in 100 mL of methanol and stirred for clear solution, then filtered to make it particle free. The solvent from the filtrate was subjected to spray drying at inlet temperature of 70 at 45°C and outlet temperature of 42°C to afford the title compound. The resulting dispersion was found to be amorphous by X-ray powder diffraction.
Example 15: Preparation of a solid dispersion comprising an amorphous form of eliglustat hemitartarate
2g of eliglustat hemitartarate was charged in 40 mL of methanol followed by addition of 2g of PVP K-30. The mixture was stirred for clear solution and filtered to make it particle free, the bed was washed with 20 mL of methanol. Then 2g of Syloid is added to the filtrate and filtrate is subjected to distillation under reduced pressure at about 57°C and obtained solid was subjected to drying at about 57°C to afford the title solid. The resulting dispersion was found to be amorphous by X-ray powder diffraction according to Fig. 7a. The said dispersion is kept at 25°C under 40% relative humidity for 24 hours and PXRD was recorded and found to be amorphous according to Fig 7b.
Example 16: Preparation of a solid dispersion comprising an amorphous form of eliglustat hemitartarate
2g of eliglustat hemitartarate was charged in 40 mL of methanol followed by addition of 2g of Copovidone. The mixture was stirred for clear solution and filtered to make it particle free, the bed was washed with 20 mL of methanol. Then 2g of Syloid is added to the filtrate and filtrate is subjected to distillation under reduced pressure at about 57°C and obtained solid was subjected to drying at about 57°C to afford the title solid. The resulting dispersion was found to be amorphous by X-ray powder diffraction according to Fig. 8a. The said dispersion is kept at 25°C under 40% relative humidity for 24 hours and PXRD was recorded and found to be amorphous according to Fig. 8b and D90 of the resultant solid is about 437 microns.
Example 17: Preparation of a solid dispersion comprising an amorphous form of eliglustat hemitartarate and Syloid
1 g of eliglustat hemitartarate was dissolved in 25 ml_ of methanol and filtered to make it particle free. Then 1 g of Syloid 244 FPNF was added to the filtrate and solvent from the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure at 56°C and obtained solid was subjected to drying at 56°C to afford the title solid. The resulting dispersion was found to be amorphous by X-ray powder diffraction according to Fig. 9 and D90 of the resultant solid is about 4 microns.
Example 18: Preparation of a solid dispersion comprising an amorphous form of eliglustat hemitartarate and Syloid
1 g of eliglustat hemitartarate was dissolved in 25 ml_ of methanol and filtered to make it particle free. Then 500mg of Syloid 244 FPNF was added to the filtrate and solvent from the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure at 56°C and obtained solid was subjected to drying at 56°C to afford the title solid. The resulting dispersion was found to be amorphous by X-ray powder diffraction.
PATENT
(WO2015059679) IMPROVED PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF ELIGLUSTAT
DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES LIMITED [IN/IN]; 8-2-337, Road No. 3, Banjara Hills Hyderabad 500034 (IN)
JAVED, Iqbal; (IN).
DAHANUKAR, Vilas Hareshwar; (IN).
ORUGANTI, Srinivas; (IN).
KANDAGATLA, Bhaskar; (IN)
Eliglustat tartrate (Genz-1 12638) is a glucocerebroside (glucosylceramide) synthase inhibitor for the treatment of gaucher disease and other lysosomal storage disorders, which is currently under development.
Eliglustat is chemically known as 1 R, 2R-Octanoic acid [2-(2′, 3′-dihydro-benzo [1 , 4] dioxin-6′-yl)-2-hydroxy-1 -pyrrolidin-1 -ylmethyl]-ethyl]-amide, having a structural formula I depicted here under.
Formula I
Eliglustat hemitartrate (Genz-1 12638) development by Genzyme, is a glucocerebroside (glucosylceramide) synthase inhibitor for the treatment of Gaucher disease and other lysosomal storage disorders. Eliglustat hemitartrate is orally active with potent effects on the primary identified molecular target for type 1 Gaucher disease and other glycosphingolipidoses, appears likely to fulfill high expectations for clinical efficacy. Gaucher disease belongs to the class of lysosomal diseases known as glycosphingolipidoses, which result directly or indirectly from the accumulation of glycosphingolipids, many hundreds of which are derived from glucocerebroside. The first step in glycosphingolipid biosynthesis is the formation of glucocerebroside, the primary storage molecule in Gaucher disease, via glucocerebroside synthase (uridine diphosphate [UDP] – glucosylceramide glucosyl transferase). Eliglustat hemitartrate is based on improved inhibitors of glucocerebroside synthase.
U.S. patent No. 7,196,205 (herein described as US’205) discloses a process for the preparation of eliglustat or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. In this patent, eliglustat was synthesized via a seven-step process involving steps in that sequence: (i) coupling S-(+)-2-phenyl glycinol with phenyl bromoacetate followed by column chromatography for purification of the resulting intermediate, (ii) reacting the resulting (5S)-5-phenylmorpholin-2-one with 1 , 4-benzodioxan-6-carboxaldehyde to obtain a lactone, (iii) opening the lactone of the oxazolo-oxazinone cyclo adduct via reaction with pyrrolidine, (iv) hydrolyzing the oxazolidine ring, (v) reducing the amide to amine to obtain sphingosine like compound, (vi) reacting the resulting amine with octanoic acid and N-hydroxysuccinimide to obtain crude eliglustat, (vii) purifying the crude eliglustat by repeated isolation for four times from a mixture of ethyl acetate and n-heptane.
U.S. patent No. 6855830, 7265228, 7615573, 7763738, 8138353, U.S. patent application publication No. 2012/296088 disclose processes for preparation of eliglustat and intermediates thereof.
U.S. patent application publication No. 2013/137743 discloses (i) a hemitartrate salt of eliglustat, (ii) a hemitartrate salt of eliglustat, wherein at least 70% by weight of the salt is crystalline, (iii) a hemitartrate salt of Eliglustat, wherein at least 99% by weight of the salt is in a single crystalline form.
It is also an objective of the present application to provide an improved process for the preparation of eliglustat and a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof which is high yielding, simple, cost effective, environment friendly and commercially viable by avoiding repeated cumbersome and lengthy purification steps. It is a further objective of the present application to provide crystalline forms of eliglustat free base and its salts.
Example 6: Preparation of Eliglustat {(1 R, 2R)-Octanoic acid[2-(2′,3′-dihydro-benzo [1 , 4] dioxin-6′-yl)-2-hydroxy-1 -pyrrolidin-1-ylmethyl-ethyl]-amide}.
(1 R, 2R)-2-Amino-1 -(2′, 3′-dihydro-benzo [1 , 4] dioxin-6′-yl)-3-pyrrolidin-1 -yl-propan-1 -ol (15g) obtained from above stage 5 was dissolved in dry dichloromethane (150ml) at room temperature under nitrogen atmosphere and cooled to 10-15° C. Octanoic acid N-hydroxy succinimide ester (13.0 g)was added to the above reaction mass at 10-15° C and stirred for 15 min. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16h-18h. Progress of the reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography. After completion of reaction, the reaction mixture was cooled to 15°C and diluted with 2M NaOH solution (100 ml_) and stirred for 20 min at 20 °C. The organic layer was separated and washed with 2M sodium hydroxide (3x90ml).The organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate (30g) and concentrated under reduced pressure at a water bath temperature of 45°C to give the crude compound (20g).The crude is again dissolved in methyl tertiary butyl ether (25 ml_) and precipitated with Hexane (60ml). It is stirred for 10 min, filtered and dried under vacuum to afford Eliglustat as a white solid (16g). Yield: 74%, Mass (m/zj: 404.7 HPLC (% Area Method): 97.5 %, ELSD (% Area Method): 99.78%, Chiral HPLC (% Area Method): 99.78 %.
Example 7: Preparation of Eliglustat oxalate.
Eliglustat (5g) obtained from above stage 6 is dissolved in Ethyl acetate (5ml) at room temperature under nitrogen atmosphere. Oxalic acid (2.22g) dissolved in ethyl acetate (5ml) was added to the above solution at room temperature and stirred for 14h. White solid observed in the reaction mixture was filtered and dried under vacuum at room temperature for 1 h to afford Eliglustat oxalate as a white solid (4g). Yield: 65.46%, Mass (m/zj: 404.8 [M+H] +> HPLC (% Area Method): 95.52 %, Chiral HPLC (% Area Method): 99.86 %
G.V. Prasad, chairman, Dr Reddy’s Laboratories
//////////////New patent, WO 2016001885, Dr Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd, Eliglustat hemitartarate, WO 2015059679