Monday, 7 September 2015

MEGAFINE PHARMA (P) LTD, NEW PATENT, WO2015128875 A PROCESS FOR PREPARATION OF DABIGATRAN ETEXILATE MESYLATE AND INTERMEDIATES THEREOF



WO2015128875
A PROCESS FOR PREPARATION OF DABIGATRAN ETEXILATE MESYLATE AND INTERMEDIATES THEREOF
MEGAFINE PHARMA (P) LTD. [IN/IN]; Sethna, 4th Floor 55, Maharishi Karve Road, Marine Lines Mumbai 400002 (IN)

MEGAFINE
The present invention relates to an improved process for the preparation of Dabigatran etexilate and its acid addition salts thereof, wherein the said process substantially eliminates the potential impurities. The present invention also relates to an intermediate of Dabigatran etexilate and process for preparation thereof.

Dabigatran etexilate mesylate is an oral anticoagulant from the class of the direct thrombin inhibitors. Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are a class of medication that act as anticoagulants (delaying blood clotting) by directly inhibiting the enzyme thrombin. It is used to help prevent strokes or serious blood clots in people who have atrial fibrillation (a condition in which the heart beats irregularly, increasing the chance of clots forming in the body and possibly causing strokes) without heart valve disease. Dabigatran etexilate mesylate is approved in both US and Europe and commercially available under the brand name of Pradaxa.
Dabigatran etexilate mesylate is a double prodrug of the active substance, Dabigatran of formula (II). It is the pharmacologically active molecule formed through hydrolysis c

Dabigatran and process for its preparation was first disclosed in WO9837075 (henceforth Ό75) disclosed process involves the reaction of l-methyl-2-[N-[4amidinophenyl] aminomethyl]benzimidazol-5 -yl-carboxylicacid-N-(2-pyridyl)- N-(2-ethoxycarbonylethyl)amide hydrochloride of formula (VI) with hexylchloroformate in presence of potassium carbonate in tetrahydrofuran/water to provide l-methyl-2-[N -[4-(N -n-hexyloxycarbonylamidino) phenyl Jaminomethyl Jbenzimidazol- 5-yl-carboxylicacid- N-(2-pyridyl)- N-(2-ethoxy carbonylethyl)amide (herein after referred as dabigatran etexilate) of compound of formula (I). But WO'075 does not discuss or exemplify process for preparation of Dabigatran etexilate mesylate salt.
The key step of the disclosed process is the conversion of the nitrile of the Formula (V) into the amidine hydrochloride of formula (VI) by pinner reaction. The low yields of the pinner reaction can be derived from the water sensibility of the reaction on the one hand while the realization of the reaction is rendered more difficult on the other by the fact that the ester as well as amide, function of the molecule is susceptible to hydrolysis. According to Example 58b of said patent in an analogous manner to Example 25d 1.2 g of l-methyl-2-[N-(4-cyanophenyl)-aminomethyl]-5-benzimidazole-carboxylic acid-N-(2-pyridyl)-N-[2-(ethoxycarbonylethyl]-amide (V) is reacted with ethanol saturated with hydrochloric acid in large dilution. The evaporated crude product is then converted to hydrochloric acid salt of l-methyl-2-[N-(4-amidinophenyl)-aminomethyl]-5- benzimidazole-carboxylic acid-N-(2-pyridyl)-N-[2-(ethoxycarbonyl)-ethyl]- amide compound of formula(VI) using ethanol and ammonium carbonate. The disclosed process was not suitable for large scale production because of tedious workup procedures, less yield, low purity, separation by column chromatography, which in turn results in excessive production time and costlier process and less eco-friendly. The purification step performed by using large dilutions and column chromatography makes scale up and
commercialization of the process strongly limited. Hence, this process commercially viable.

Formula (VI)
SCHEME - I
Example 1 13 of WO'075 reveals the total yield of the final compound (I) is 22%.
J.Med.Chem. 2002, 45, 1757-1766 describes a process for preparation of compound of formula (III) as depicted in scheme -II.

SCHEME - II
The process for preparation of mesylate salt of dabigatran etexilate and its polymorphic forms was disclosed in US2005/234104. The disclosed process involves the reaction of Dabigatran etexilate with methane sulfonic acid in acetone to provide Dabigatran etexilate mesylate.
According to WO 2012/153158 (henceforth W0' 158) dabigatran etexilate base compound of formula (I) is characterized by mass spectrum, 1H NMR and melting point (128-129°C).WO 2008/059029 reports the melting point of 128 ±3°C for the anhydrous form-Ill. Further W0' 158 discloses that according to WO2006/000353 dabigatran etexilate of formula (I) is prepared as described in Examples 5A and 5B by reacting the tosylate salt of (6) and hexylchloroformate in an acetone-aqueous medium, obtained product is dried at 45°C and is not characterized by analytical data. On the basis of the calculations the product is presumed to be anhydrous. Thus according to WO 2006/000353 dabigatran etexilate is prepared by crystallization from an acetone/water system (Example 5A) and in said process no drying agent or other dehydrating agent is used.
Further W0' 158 reveals that on following the example 5A of WO 2006/000353 authors failed to obtain anhydrous dabigatran etexilate but rather modification thereof containing four moles of water was observed in dabigatran etexilate.
Further W0' 158 discloses that two anhydrous and tetrahydro form of dabigatran etexilate are described in WO 2006/131491. In this international patent application no process is disclosed for preparation of dabigatran etexilate but reference is made rather to basic patent and hence the said new forms are obtained by recrystallization from ethyl acetate (anhydrous form-I and anhydrous II Examples 1 and 2) and a mixture of acetone and water (tetrahydrate form, example 3).
According to disclosure of W0' 158, WO 2007/007142 three further variants are disclosed for the preparation of dabigatran etexilate (1) starting from the tosylate salt of the amidine (6); said procedures differ from each other in the reaction conditions and the work-up method. Thus Example 6A is identical with Example 5A of WO 2006/000353, however in the working up method of new variants 6B and 6C an azeotropic distillation is employed using butyl acetate for dehydration. Accordingly in these cases actually the anhydrate of dabigatran etexilate (1) is formed and consequently the yield is lower (yield of 1 using ditosylate of 6).
As per W0' 158, an article published in 2009 (UP .'Com. Journal 2009, 9, 20) reports a detailed process for the realization of the Pinner-reaction mentioned in the basic patent, wherein the hydrolysis of the nitrile derivative of formula (V) is carried out at room temperature with the aid of an approximately 100 molar amount of hydrochloric acid. The process involves five re-crystallization steps to obtain pure di-hydrochloride (characterized by XRD). The disadvantages of the disclosed process are high dilution ratio, low yield, process is restricted to smaller batch size at commercial scale, process results in formation of impurities and is not cost effective at commercial scale, and involve 5 purification steps thereby making the said process unsuitable at industrial scale.
WO 2010/045900 discloses the preparation of free base of dabigatran etexilate of formula (I), from oxalate salt of nitrile compound of formula (V) via monohydrochloride and dihydrochloride of the amidine of formula (VI). These salts are found to degrade and lead to the formation of impurities and thereby yield dabigatran etexilate with low purity. Thus making the process less favorable at industrial scale.
Like any synthetic compound, Dabigatran etexilate mesylate contain extraneous compounds or impurities that can come from many sources. They may be un-reacted starting materials, by-products of reaction, products ,of side reaction, and/or degradation products. To meet the regulatory quality norms, identification, isolation, synthesis and characterization of the impurities followed by their control to the ICH levels in the final drug compound is a must. Potential impurities of Dabigatran etexilate mesylate are disclosed in EP2522662 and it also addresses the stability issues associated with dabigatran etexilate mesylate. Additionally W0' 158 discloses the additional set of impurities which are formed due to the use of poor quality of hexyl chloroformate. Hence, there is a need of simple, efficient and production friendly process for the preparation of dabigatran etexilate mesylate with high purity, yield and higher throughput.

The present invention relates to an improved process for preparation of l-methyl-2- [N-[4-(N-nhexyloxycarbonylamidino)phenyl]aminomethyl]benz imidazol-5-yl-carboxylicacid-N-(2-pyridyl)-N-(2-ethoxycarbonylethyl)amide compound of formula (I) also known as dabigatran etexilate and its methane sulfonate salt compound of formula (la), represented by the following structural formulae:

Dabigatran Etexilate Dabigatran Etexilate Mesylate
The process of the present invention is an improved, commercially viable and industrially advantageous process for the preparation of Dabigatran etexilate mesylate wherein, the said process substantially eliminates the impurities formed during the preparation of Dabigatran etexilate mesylate.
Further, the present invention also provides novel acid additions salts of ethyl N-[(2- { [(4-cyanophenyl)amino]methyl} - 1 -methyl- 1 -H-benzimidazol-5-yl0carbonyl]-N- pyridin-2-yl-beta-alaninate (DEM-III), preferably p-toluene sulfonic acid salt, represented by structural formula (V), an useful intermediate in the synthesis of highly pure compound (la).

.p-toluene sulfonic acid addition sail
Formula (V)
............................

Formula (la)

Formula (la)



n)Dabigatran etexilate mesylate:
52.6 gm ' of ethyl 3-[(2{[4(hexyloxycarbonylaminoiminomethyl)phenylamino] methyl} - 1 -methyl- 1 H-benzimidazole-5-carbonyl)pyridin-2-ylamino]propionate dihydrate was added to 293 gm of acetone. The obtained mixture was heated to 40-46° C. with stirring. After a clear solution has formed, the contents of the apparatus was filtered and the filtrate was cooled to 30° C. to 36° C. 42 gm of acetone was precooled to 0° C. to 5° C and to it was added 7.5gm of 99.5% methanesulfonic acid. The obtained methanesulfonic acid solution was added in to the solution of ethyl 3-[(2- { [4-(hexyloxycarbonylaminoiminomethyl)phenylamino]methyl } - 1 -methyl- 1 H-benzimi-dazole-5-carbonyl)pyridin-2-ylamino]propionate base at 26° C. to 36° C. within 15 to 40 minutes. Then the mixture was stirred for 40 to 60 minutes at 26° C. to 33° C. It was then cooled to 17° C. to 23° C. and stirred for a further 40 to 80 minutes. The crystal suspension was filtered and washed 270 ml of acetone. The product was dried under vacuum at 45-50° C. for at least 4 hours.
Yield: 53g (91.93%); Purity by HPLC: 99.81%.
CLAIM
Claim:
1. A process for the preparation of dabigatran etexilate of formula (I) or its acid addition salts thereof, comprising;
a. reacting hexyl-4-riitrophenyl carbonate compound of formula (XII) with 1- methyl-2-[N-[4-amidinophenyl]aminomethyl]benzimidazol-5-yl- carboxylicacid-N-(2-pyridyl)-N-(2-ethoxycarbonylethyl)amide (VI) or its acid addition salt in presence of a base and in a suitable organic solvent to provide dabigatran etexilate (I);

CLIPPED 2-43
44. The process as claimed in claim 18, wherein the form-I of dabigatran etexilate mesylate has purity greater than 99%; preferably 99.5%; more preferably 99.81% when determined by HPLC.
45. The process of any of the preceding claims, dabigatran etexilate of formula (I) or its acid addition salt of formula (la) has less than about 0.2% of DBIMP-1 impurity, has less than about 0.2% of DBIMP-2 impurity, has less than about 0.2% of DBIMP-3 impurity, has less than about 0.2% of DBIMP-4 impurity, has less than about 0.2% of DBIMP-5 impurity, has less than about 0.2% of DBIMP-6 impurity, has less than about 0.2% of DBIMP-7 impurity, has less than about 0.2% of DBIMP-8 impurity, has less than about 0.2% of DBIMP-9 impurity, has less than about 0.2% of DBIMP-10 impurity, has less than about 0.2% of DBIMP-11 impurity, has less than about 0.2% of DBIMP-12 impurity.

DBIMP-8

DBIMP- 1 DBIMP-12


ABOUT MEGAFINE

PROFILE

The company's R&D strengths are in creating intellectual property assets by developing non-infringing, novel, cost effective and environmentally friendly processes for APIs and finding easier solutions to complex chemistry challenges. We are specialized in constructing chiral molecules with strong expertise and experience in the resolution processes. Our R&D team consists of more than 60 qualified scientists with extensive expertise and experience in Process Research and Development activities for APIs and their critical intermediates. Our main philosophy is backward integration of APIs synthesis starting from basic raw material, thereby being self-dependent for critical intermediates to control cost and quality. Solid state studies, particularly polymorphism and particle size are proving to be bottle neck in marketing newer APIs. At Megafine, scientists are skilled in providing solutions to the problems associated with them. We have two research centres, one at Nashik, Maharashtra, India and another at Vapi, Gujarat, India. R&D centre at Vapi is mainly focused to provide critical intermediates with high purity and low cost through intensive research to our main R&D centre at Nashik and as well as to API manufacturers around the globe. A well - equipped R&D centre is supported by kilo lab having reactors from 5 lit to 250 lit, SSR/GLR vessels to solve scale-up issues at production. We are very specific in creating online documentations for various phases of process development including the scale-up, safety, and engineering reports which help production to have a safe and robust process and also to support regulatory filings.
Megafine, established in 1995, is a privately owned and professionally managed enterprise with it's corporate office in Mumbai and two multipurpose manufacturing sites at Vapi & Nashik in India, both successfully inspected by US-FDA & the Nashik facility is also approved by EMEA, PMDA & KFDA. Both the plants are also certified by WHO GMP, ISO 9001:2008, 14001:2004 & OHSAS 18001:2007 and have been audited by several Innovators and leading Generic companies from time to time.
Megafine provides innovative & integrated API solutions with it's decades of experience and skill in the development of novel chemical processes catering to the global drug discovery and generic companies. Our continuous investment in research and development generates a steady flow of APIs enabling timely introduction of new products in the market. Megafine is committed to respecting third party intellectual property rights, manufacture products which are commercially competitive and meet the most stringent quality standards. Besides manufacturing its own Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) & Advanced Intermediates, we also contract manufacture for global drug discovery and generic companies.
Our focus is on niche products; with a presence in more than 40 countries. Our partners are essentially drug discovery and generic drug companies across the globe for whom we develop a range of new niche products in select therapeutic categories like Anthelmintic, Cardiology, Urinary Incontinence, CNS (Central Nervous System), & a few others. We supply a wide range of high quality generic and custom manufactured APIs in volumes that range from a few grams to tons.
Megafine has special expertise in Polymorphs and Chiral products.
A perfect blend of Human talent, R&D Labs, Pilot Plant & cGMP manufacturing facilities backed by our Quality Assurance, Regulatory Affairs and Intellectual Property cell gives Megafine an edge.
Our regulatory team is well trained & experienced to comply with US-FDA, EDQM, Japanese PMDA & other regulatory authority requirements. The company has over 150 regulatory filings across the globe for its APIs to its credit with an impressive pipeline.





/////////MEGAFINE PHARMA (P) LTD, NEW PATENT, WO 2015128875  A PROCESS FOR PREPARATION OF DABIGATRAN ETEXILATE MESYLATE AND INTERMEDIATES THEREOF

Saturday, 29 August 2015

Polymorphisms and Patent, Market, and Legal Battles:  Cefdinir Case Study

Abstract Image


Cefdinir is a third-generation oral cephalosporin antibiotic sold under the brand names Cefzon and Omnicef
As of 2008, cefdinir, as Omnicef, was the highest-selling cephalosporin antibiotic in the United States, with more than US$585 million in retail sales of its generic versions alone.[1]
It was discovered by Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (now Astellas) and introduced in 1991 under the brand name Cefzon.[2][3]Warner-Lambert licensed this cephalosporin for marketing in US from Fujisawa.[4] Abbott obtained U.S. marketing rights to Omnicef (cefdinir) in December 1998 through an agreement with Warner-Lambert Company.[5] It was approved by FDA on Dec 4, 1997.[6] It is available in US as Omnicef by Abbott Laboratories and in India as Cednir by Abbott, Kefnir by Glenmark and Cefdiel by Ranbaxy.

The ongoing patent battle relating to Cefdinir polymorphism and crystalline forms is described from a scientific point of view. This case study illustrates some of the strategies adopted by generic bulk manufacturers to challenge originator's patents on polymorphic forms. 

The filing of patents claiming new crystalline forms, usually 4−6 years after the original product patent, is a typical strategy applied by such companies to extend patent protection. This patent protection approach by big pharma forces generic bulk producers to discover and file patents on new polymorphs if they want to market the drug after expiry of the product patents. 

Polymorphism is of paramount importance due to its effect on some physical characteristics of powders such as melting point, flowability, vapour pressure, bulk density, chemical reactivity, apparent solubility and dissolution rate, and optical and electrical properties. In other words, polymorphism can affect drug stability, manipulation, and bioavailability

The patent strategy adopted by Fujisawa to protect the life cycle of Cefdinir (1) was based on the filing of a second patent, several years after the product patent, covering the commercialised anhydrous crystalline form of the drug. As a consequence, to overcome the Cefdinir (1) patent protection of the U.S. and Japanese markets, generic bulk producers had to discover a new crystalline form, with the same bioavailability as the marketed one. 

The situation, with competition among several companies, resulted in the generation of a patent “tangle”. In addition to overcoming the Fujisawa patent, the principal aim of generic bulk producers was to generate a competitive market advantage by protecting their new crystal form.

This patent extended the protection of Cefdinir (1) marketed in the United States up to December 2011, 9 years after the expiration of the patent covering the structure........Abbott US2005/0059818


An invention must:
A. be novel.
B. not be obvious for a person skilled in the art
C. be useful.
D. contain sufficient details to allow others to reproduce the invention.
Crystalline form patents represent a small but very important segment of product patents because of the possibility to extend the medicine market protection, thus delaying competition from generic firms. We think that for these specific types of patent applications, the following basic rules should be applied:
1. The crystalline form cannot be characterised by a single technique.
2. When a pharmaceutical application or advantage is claimed to justify the usefulness of the patent application, volatile impurities must comply with ICH guidelines,23 and the new crystalline form must be sufficiently stable to be used as a medicine.
3. A new polymorph must have an advantage over the one previously described. All the patent applications described in this paper do not show a clear advantage of the claimed polymorph with respect to Fujisawa's anhydrous form. The claiming of a crystalline form or solvate without a clear understanding of the usefulness is common to several patent case studies. From our direct experience, an interesting example is Cabergoline (Parkinson's disease):  the originator and generic companies claimed up to 14 crystalline forms and solvates.24 What is the meaning of all these patent applications? Where is the advantage with respect to the previously reported crystalline forms or solvates?
Figure
Figure The priority filing dates of all the patents claiming Cefdnir crystalline forms are reported.

Astellas Pharma Inc. (アステラス製薬株式会社 Asuterasu Seiyaku Kabushiki-gaisha?) is a Japanese pharmaceutical company, formed on 1 April 2005 from the merger of Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (山之内製薬株式会社 Yamanouchi Seiyaku Kabushiki-gaisha?) and Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (藤沢薬品工業株式会社 Fujisawa Yakuhin Kōgyō Kabushiki-gaisha?).


Cefdinir.svg

Polymorphisms and Patent, Market, and Legal Battles:  Cefdinir Case Study

Antibioticos S.p.A., Research & Development, Strada Rivoltana km 6/7, 20089 Rodano, Milano, Italy
Org. Process Res. Dev., 2007, 11 (1), pp 64–72
DOI: 10.1021/op0601060

//////

Sunday, 26 July 2015

WO 2015104605.new patent on Rivaroxaban, Wockhardt Ltd



Process for preparing rivaroxaban - comprising the reaction of a thioester compound and its salts with 4-{4-[(5S)-5-(aminomethyl)-2-oxo-1,3-oxazolidin-3-yl]phenyl}morpholine-3-one.

WO-2015104605
SHUKLA, Jagdish Dattopant; (IN).
YADAV, Ramprasad; (IN).
MERWADE, Arvind Yekanathsa; (IN).
DEO, Keshav; (IN)



Wockhardt Ltd
The synthesis of (II) via intermediate (I) is described (example 7, page 15)
4-{4-[(5S)-5-(Aminomethyl)-2-oxo-1,3-oxazolidin-3-yl]phenyl}morpholine-3-one (formula III) is (I) and rivaroxaban is (II) (claim 1, page 16).

The present invention relates to a process for the preparation of Rivaroxaban and its novel intermediates, or pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof. The present invention provides novel intermediates, which may be useful for the preparation of Rivaroxaban or its pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof. The process of preparation by using novel intermediate is very simple cost effective and may be employed at commercial scale. The product obtained by using novel intermediate yield the Rivaroxaban of purity 99% or more, when measured by HPLC. The present invention especially relates to a process for the preparation of Rivaroxaban from thioester of formula II, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, wherein R is leaving group.

front page image





A PROCESS FOR PREPARING RIVAROXABAN OR A
PHARMACEUTICALLY ACCEPTABLE SALT THEREOF

Field of Invention

The present invention relates to a process for the preparation of Rivaroxaban and its novel intermediates, or pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof. The present invention provides novel intermediates, which may be useful for the preparation of Rivaroxaban or its pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof. The process of preparation by using novel intermediate is very simple cost effective and may be employed at commercial scale. The product obtained by using novel intermediate yield the Rivaroxaban of purity 99% or more, when measured by HPLC. The novel thioester intermediate represented by formula II


Formula II
or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, wherein R is leaving group.

Background of the invention

The drug compound having the adopted name "Rivaroxaban" has chemical name, 5-chloro-N-({(5S)-2-oxo-3-[4-(3-oxo-4-morpholinyl)phenyl]-l,3-oxazolidin-5- yljmethyl)-2-thiophenecarboxamide; and has the structural formula I,


Formula I
The commercial pharmaceutical product XARELTO® tablets, contains rivaroxaban as active ingredient. Rivaroxaban is a factor Xa inhibitor useful as oral anticoagulant. Rivaroxaban can be used for the prevention and treatment of various thromboembolic diseases, in particular of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), myocardial infract, angina pectoris and restenoses after angioplasty or aortocoronary bypass, cerebral stroke, transitory ischemic attacks, and peripheral arterial occlusive diseases.

U.S. Patent No. 7, 157,456 describes Rivaroxaban and process for the preparation thereof. The process of US '456 for rivaroxaban involves reaction of 2-[(2S)-2-oxiranylmethyl]-lH-isoindole-l,3(2H)-dione with 4-(4-aminophenyl)-3-morpholinone to provide 2-((2R)-2-hydroxy-3- { [4-(3-oxo-4-morpholiny)phenyl]amino Jpropyl)- lH-isoindole- 1 ,3(2H)-dione, which on cyclization using Ν,Ν-carbonyl diimidazole to afford 2-({5S)-2-Oxo-3-[4-(3-oxo-4-morpholiny)phenyl]-l,3-oxazolidin-5-yl}methyl)-lH-isoindole-l,3(2H)-dione, which on reacted with methylamine followed by reaction with 5-chlorothiophene-2-carbonyl chloride to provide Rivaroxaban.


Various processes for the preparation of rivaroxaban, its intermediates, and related compounds are disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 7,585,860; 7,351,823, 7,816,355, and 8,101,609; patent application Nos. WO 2011/012321, WO 2012/156983, WO 2012/153155, WO 2013/053739, WO 2013/098833, WO 2013/156936, WO 2013/152168, WO 2013/120464, WO 2013/164833, US 2012/0283434 and US 2013/184457; and J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 5900-5908.

The reported processes suffers one or the other problems like lower yield, use of carcinogenic reagents like hydrobromic acid at elevated temperature, longer reaction time, and the like.

Therefore, there is a need to develop a simple and industrially feasible process for Rivaroxaban and its intermediates or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

Wockhardt Ltd chairman Habil Khorakiwala




process includes the step of , reacting thioester of formula IIA or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof
Formula IIA
with 4-{4-[(5S)-5-(aminomethyl)-2-oxo-l,3-oxazolidin-3-yl]phenyl}morpholine-3-one of formula III,
Formula III



Formula I


EXAMPLE 7: One pot process for Rivaroxaban
The triphenylphosphine (11.5g) and mercaptobenzothiazole disulphide (15.31g) were taken in methylene chloride and reaction mixture was stirred at 28°C -30°C for 1 hr. The 5-chlorothiophene-2-carboxylic acid (7.2g) and triethylamine (3.8 g) were added to the above reaction mixture. The reaction mixture is stirred at 0°C -25 °C for 1 hr. after 1 hr 4-{4-[(5S)-5-(aminomethyl)-2-oxo-l,3-oxazolidin-3-yl]phenyl}morpholine-3-one (lOg) and triethylamine (3.8g) were added. The resulting reaction mixture further stirred for 2 hrs. After completion of the reaction, water was added and stirred for 10 min. aqueous layer was separated and washed with methylene chloride. The organic layer was acidified to pH 6-7 with 2N hydrochloric acid and finally the organic layer was concentrated to get desired product. The product was purified and dried to yield Rivaroxaban.
Yield: 10.0 gm
Purity: 99.3 %
EXAMPLE 8: One pot process for Rivaroxaban
Exemplified procedure in example 7 with the replacement of solvent ethyl acetate and base potassium hydroxide were used to get the rivaroxaban.
EXAMPLE 9: One pot process for Rivaroxaban
Exemplified procedure in example 7 with the replacement of solvent acetonitile and base potassium carbonate were used, methylene chloride was added in the reaction mixture to extract the Rivaroxaban.





////////

Wednesday, 22 July 2015

Selin Sinem Erciyas

 
Selin Sinem Erciyas

Selin is a partner specializing in Patent, Life Sciences and Trademark Law. She has been involved in a number of advisory and litigation IP matters and has handled hundreds of contentious and non-contentious oppositions and court actions involving patents and trademarks. Selin has led on a number of patent infringements, declaration of non-infringement and nullity actions. 
She is a graduate of Ankara University and holds an LL.M. degree in European and International Commercial Law from the Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich. 
She worked at the European Patent Office as a trainee lawyer in International and Legal PCT Affairs Department. She is a member of Ankara Bar Association.
 

 





SELIN SINEM ERCIYAS

Tel:
Work +90 312 213 86 37
Email:

WORK DEPARTMENT

Intellectual Property, Life Sciences, Commercial Litigation.

POSITION

Selin Sinem Erciyas is partner in Intellectual Property Department, specializing in Patent Law and Life Sciences issues. Selin has been involved in a number of advisory and litigation matters on all fields of IP and handled hundreds of both contentious and non-contentious administrative oppositions and court actions involving patents and trademarks. Selin took responsibility in a number of patent infringement actions, declaration of non-infringement actions and nullity actions. She represents number of multinational pharmaceutical companies before the Ministry of Health in relation with regulatory issues and assists these pharmaceutical companies in regulatory examinations before the MOH. Selin is a counsel to the Association of Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies (AIFD). She represented the AIFD at the commission meetings of the Turkish Parliament on the draft Patent Law in Turkey. Selin represented AIFD and EFPIA before the Turkish Government and EU Delegation to Turkey in relation with patent and regulatory matters.

CAREER

Gün+Partners 2006 - to date Trainee Lawyer – European Patent Office- International and Legal PCT Affairs Department- 2006.

LANGUAGES

Turkish, German, English.

MEMBER

Ankara Bar Association, AIPPI, FICPI, GRUR, MARQUES.

EDUCATION

Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich (LL.M Eur.- European and International Commercial Law 2005) Ankara University (Faculty of Law- LL.B- 2002) Arı College -1998.

Selin Sinem Yalıncaklı ERCİYAS

KORESEHITLERI CAD 17ZINCIRLIKUYU34394 ISTANBULTURKEY